#Cost of motorcycle plates in ohio drivers

Using administrative data from previous years, they also determined that drivers whose license plates were not impounded under lax enforcement of the policy were 2.5 times as likely as drivers whose plates were impounded to reoffend in the next month this effect lessened over time, although some effects persisted for up to three years. Both DWI recidivism and DWS violations were lower for the plate impoundment group than for a similar group (first-offense drivers with BACs of 0.17 to 0.19) at all points in time, ranging from 30 days to one year. Leaf and Preusser, 2011, examined the effect that Minnesota’s license plate impoundment had on first-offense drivers whose BACs were between 0.20 and 0.22. When “plate impoundment does not involve the courts, it occurs quickly, consistently, and efficiently (, Strategy B2 )” (UNC Highway Safety Research Center, 2011, p.

In addition, an offender may also adopt coping behaviors to avoid DWS penalties, such as registering a car in another person’s name. However, the reach of the law was limited because offenders’ impoundment orders could be lost during the many steps in the procedure (an order is issued, later reviewed in an administrative office, and then a notification is sent by mail to the offender). For example, switching to police-based procedures for license confiscation from court-based procedures increased the number of confiscations more than ten-fold. Although this study did not examine the effectiveness of the sanction on recidivism, the researchers reported several findings relevant to understanding license impoundment legislation. Rodgers used survival analysis and found that third-time DWI violators with impounded plates had significantly fewer DWI convictions after two years than similar offenders whose plates were not impounded.Īnother study in Minnesota reviewed administrative data and interviewed police officers and repeat offenders (Ross, Simon, and Cleary, 1996). “In Minnesota, license plate impoundment was shown to reduce recidivism when administered by the arresting officer ()” (UNC Highway Safety Research Center, 2011, p.

UseĪs of 2004, 16 states were impounding license plates (McKnight et al., 2008). Vehicle and plate sanctions evolved as a way to deter offenders from committing further DWS and DWI violations (Voas and DeYoung, 2002). However, offenders may continue to endanger others by driving illegally, an offense known as driving while suspended (DWS). Since the early 1980s, convicted DWI offenders have been subject to administrative license revocation (ALR) laws that suspend the offender’s driving privileges for a period of time. (UNC Highway Safety Research Center, 2011, p. See also Brunson and Knighten (2005), Practice #4, and, Strategies B1, B2, and C1. and give an overview of vehicle and license plate sanctions and are the basic references for the information provided below. Impoundment periods are sometimes equivalent to the duration of license suspension for a DWI offense. The impoundment period varies by state, with many states imposing a 90-day penalty (Voas, 2008). License plate impoundment seize and impound or destroy the license plate. These sanctions are intended to prevent the offender from driving the vehicle while the sanctions are in effect, and also to deter impaired driving by the general public. In recent years many States have implemented sanctions affecting a DWI offender’s license plate or vehicle. Table B.6 - State Laws on License Plate Impoundment, as of December 2004.

Cost of motorcycle plates in ohio